Films

8.7Skry

Groundhog Day

1993

A TV weatherman with a gift for condescension gets sent to cover Groundhog Day in Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania, and finds himself locked in a loop, waking every morning to the same six o'clock alarm and the same Sonny and Cher. Harold Ramis builds the film as a comedy whose engine is repetition — the same beats hit with incremental variation, Murray's reactions shifting from bafflement to hedonism to something more searching as the days accumulate into an uncountable span. What keeps it from becoming a stunt is that the loop is never explained or resolved on mechanical terms; the film treats the premise as a given and lets character carry the weight.

8.0Skry

Toy Story 5

2026

The toys have always competed with something — a newer model, a yard sale, a child growing up — but a tablet reframes the threat structurally. Buzz, Woody, Jessie, and the gang now contend not with a rival toy but with a device that makes toys as a category feel optional. Andrew Stanton, returning to Pixar animation after the *Finding* films, builds the premise around that generational friction: a child absorbed by a screen, a roomful of characters whose entire purpose is suddenly in question. Whether the film plays that as adventure, comedy, or something more melancholy in its margins remains to be seen.

7.9Skry

Coyote vs. Acme

2026

7.7Skry

Hoppers

2026

A girl slips her consciousness into a robotic animal body and steps into a world she thought she understood — Hoppers builds its adventure around that central gimmick and treats the animal kingdom as genuinely alien territory rather than a backdrop for cute behavior. Daniel Chong structures the film as a discovery narrative that keeps widening its own scope: each hop into a new body reframes what Mabel thinks she knows, until the animal world begins to look less like nature and more like a system with its own logic and secrets. The animation has work to do here, rendering both the robotic vessels and their organic counterparts in a register where the strangeness of the premise stays legible.

7.5Skry

Moana

2026

7.3Skry

Minions & Monsters

2026

7.0Skry

The Super Mario Galaxy Movie

2026

Klara and the Sun

2026

Forgotten Island

2026

Shaun the Sheep: The Beast of Mossy Bottom

2026

Practical Magic 2

2026

Runner

2026

Mayday

2026

Finding Emily

2026

The Devil Wears Prada 2

2026

Twenty years on from the events of the first film, the fashion world Andy Sachs once fled has changed around Miranda Priestly — and Runway, the magazine she built into a cultural instrument, now requires rescue rather than mere survival. Frankel structures the sequel as a deal-making drama inside a dying industry, with Emily Charlton's ascent to luxury-brand power turning what was once a hierarchy of humiliation into something closer to a negotiation among equals. The casting geometry does most of the positioning work: Hathaway, Streep, Blunt, and Tucci returning to roles that the first film fixed clearly in the culture, now repositioned by where each character has landed.

The Breadwinner

2026

Nate Wilcox has spent his whole adult life as the family's earner; when his wife Katie lands a deal on *Shark Tank* and leaves for an extended business trip, he's suddenly the one holding down the house. Eric Appel builds the film as a domestic role-reversal comedy, running the joke not on incompetence but on the specific disorientation of a man whose identity was built around a function he no longer has. Nate Bargatze and Mandy Moore play the couple, with Bargatze's deadpan understatement carrying most of the weight once the premise kicks in and Katie exits the frame.

The Devil Wears Prada

2006

A Midwestern journalism graduate lands a job she can barely spell — assistant to Miranda Priestly, the editor of a fashion magazine whose organizational gravity bends entire industries. David Frankel runs it as a workplace comedy that earns its dramatic pivot: the first half plays the culture gap for sharp laughs, the second turns quietly on what the protagonist is becoming by learning to survive it. What makes the film work as a formal object is Streep's performance, which refuses to play the tyrant for camp. Miranda speaks softly, rarely repeats herself, and the camera gives her the room a scene's true power source deserves. Emily Blunt and Stanley Tucci fill the margins with precision.